Why Testing and Privatization is Harmful...a Working List

Dov Rosenberg posted this on Facebook. It's a great list telling why testing and privatization is harmful to public education. Follow the link below to see the original...he said it's a Working List...aka a work in progress, so it will probably change. Spread it around!

WORKING LIST! Why Testing and Privatization are Harmful - Not Helpful - to Public Education
by Dov Rosenberg on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 at 1:12pm

High stakes tests and charter schools make public schools less effective:
A) High stakes tests do not effectively gauge student ability, are harmful to children, and make public schools less effective.
B) Less than 20% of privately-managed public schools (charter schools) are successful; they also segregate children and minimize the decision-making power of parents and the community, ultimately making public schools less effective.

High-stakes tests do not effectively gauge student ability:

• Constrict wide expanses of knowledge into only what can be measured by a multiple choice test.
• Many tests contain nonsensical questions, have multiple correct answers, or have no right answers at all (look up Pineapplegate).
• With hundreds of millions of American kids taking the same test, ethnic and regional differences aren't considered, making them unavoidably culturally biased.
• Unduly reward the superficial ability to retrieve info from the short-term memory.
• Pass/Fail status is often determined by politicians while test scores are often manipulated for political purposes.
• National Academy of Sciences, 2011 report to Congress: "Standardized tests have not increased student achievement.”
• Measure only low-level thought processes, trivializing true learning.
• Hide problems created by margin-of-error computations in scoring; scoring errors can have life-changing consequences.
• Curricula constructed from high-stakes tests are based on what legislators assume children will need to know in the future. Countless previous attempts at predicting the future have ended in failure.
• Provide minimal feedback that is useful to classroom teachers.
• Penalize test-takers who think in non-standard ways (common in children).
• Test results are not able to predict future success.
• Claimed to be used as a diagnostic tool to maximize student learning, but are actually used to punish students, teachers, and schools.

High-stakes tests are harmful to children:

• Minimal time for socializing and physical activity b/c recess and PE are cut in favor of test prep, particularly affecting low-scoring students.
• Testing anxiety has lead to sickness, vomiting, and even incontinence in the classroom.
• Excessive testing stifles the love of learning.
• Year-end tests require sitting still and staying focused for 3.5 hours, which leads to behavior problems.
• Encourage the promise of extrinsic motivators such as rewards for high scores (bribes) and punishments for low scores (threats).
• Pressure to pass tests has lead to stimulant abuse in teenagers.

High-stakes tests make public schools less effective:

• The lowest and highest achievers are left out as instructional resources are focused on learners at or near the pass/fail threshold.
• Fewer opportunities for kids to enjoy creative classes that make them love school.
• Arts and other electives are cut in favor of test prep and testing, particularly affecting students from low-income families.
• Children don't receive adequate instruction in non-tested areas like science, history, geography, government, etc.
• Divert billions of state taxpayer funds from public schools to pay huge testing firms like Pearson and ETS (Educational Testing Services).
• Divert precious time resources to test facilitation, preparation (such as begging proctors to volunteer), and administration.
• More established parents move to private schools to avoid the abundance of testing in public schools.
• When test scores trigger automatic retentions, much older students in classrooms can cause additional behavior problems
• On norm-referenced tests, nationally, 50% of students are below average, by definition. Thus, requiring all students to be at or above "grade level" is statistically impossible.
• Give testing firms control of the curriculum
• Test scores are used to evaluate teacher effectiveness in lieu of more effective administrator observations
• Reduces teacher creativity and autonomy, thereby reducing the appeal of teaching as a profession
• Minimize teachers' ability to accomodate multiple learning styles and provide adequate differentiation
• Create unreasonable pressure on students and teachers to cheat as well as on administrators and school districts to "game the system"

Less than 20% of charter schools are successful:

• Even the pro-charter documentary "Waiting for Superman" notes that only 1 in 6 charter schools succeed.
• Charter schools can artificially inflate their published success rate by deflecting low-scoring kids back to public schools, usually

Charter schools segregate children:

• Most charter schools are racially homogenous.
• Without diversity requirements, charter schools can market to specific demographics, ultimately segregating communities.
• Children from the same neighborhood often go to different schools, don't know each other, and don't play outside together. Alienation negatively impacts neighborhood communities.

Charter schools minimize the decision-making power of parents and the community:

• Private control, as opposed to elected control via school board, leaves curricula to be defined by a corporate agenda.
• Corporate-controlled charter school home offices are often centralized out of state.
• One more thing for parents and kids to worry about as they wait for acceptance letters.
• Undermine a fundamental democratic principle that the people closest to (and therefore most knowledgeable about) problems are the best positioned to deal with them.

Charter schools make public schools less effective:

• Taxpayer dollars are deflected from public schools into charter schools where they're utilized w/o transparency or accountability.
• Charter schools have the freedom to select high-achieving kids w/ few needs so low-achieving kids w/ high needs get deflected and ultimately concentrated into an underfunded local public school.
• Charter schools aren't obligated to provide special services for high-needs kids so they often get deflected and ultimately concentrated into an underfunded local public school.
• Only families who can navigate application processes can apply to a charter. Families w/o the time or know-how to "work the system" (often very poor and/or immigrant families) are ultimately concentrated into an underfunded local public school.
• Private entities have already tried running school districts according to corporate models and seen disastrous results.

What's best for kids? 

Special thanks to Marion Brady, from whom I borrowed heavily!

~~~

Stop the Testing Insanity!

Sign the National Resolution on High Stakes Testing!

~~~